I submit that this is quite enough. The last part “as it applies for the interpretation of an Act of Parliament” merely supplies an argument or a descriptive clause. As no argument or descriptive clause of this nature is permissible in a legislative enactment these words should be deleted, not that the argument or the explanation is invalid,–the argument or the explanation is quite proper–but this should be removed from the effective part of the clause. I hope that the House would consider this point.
